Niles-MortonGrove
Current Weather
- Today
- 64°
- Local every day in
Schakowsky, Dold split on philosophy behind bill. Original ideas altered.
A bill approving an extension of the payroll tax holiday and continuing long term unemployment benefits passed the United States House of Representatives Tuesday night, 234-193, and drew mixed reaction from Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Evanston) and Rep. Robert Dold (R-Kenilworth).
The bill, expected to be rejected by the Senate, would prevent an additional $1,000 coming out of American paychecks after Jan. 1 but shorten the length of time the long term unemployed can receive benefits from 99 weeks to 59 weeks.
“Congressman Dold supported this legislation because he believes it was important to extend both of these programs before they expired at the end of this year,” Dold Communications Director Stefani Zimmerman said. “Traditionally, unemployment insurance runs out after 26 weeks and he wanted to ensure that it was extended for over one year.”
Construction of the Keystone Pipeline to move oil from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico was added to the bill as well as elimination of certain environmental protections. Schakowsky anticipated these additions. She considers them partisan maneuvering.
Before the bill was ready for a vote, Schakowsky told Patch Friday she felt the Republican leadership should work with the Democrats rather than cater to Tea Party demands. “That’s the way legislation should get done,” she said. “It’s very upsetting what this will undo.”
Earlier: Congressional Inaction Could Cost Local Citizens
Millions of Americans face the prospect of less money in their pockets next year and Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Evanston, is willing to keep working through the holidays if necessary to make sure it does not happen.
Rep. Robert Dold, R-Kenilworth, who introduced legislation in September to resolve part of the problem, is working hard as well. He also has criticized one of his potential Democratic opponents for the first time over the issue, Deerfield management consultant Brad Schneider.
As part of President Barack Obama’s effort to stimulate the economy, working Americans have been paying less payroll tax, effectively increasing their disposable income. People who are out of work have been receiving extended unemployment benefits since 2009.
Though Dold wanted to see an elimination of payroll tax for a period of time for employers who hired new workers, he indicated a willingness to work with the president’s ideas after they were announced.
Both the payroll tax holiday and extended unemployment benefits cease at the end of the year without congressional intervention and movement on the issues has been slow.
“We’re not going home, for the holidays,” Schakowsky said of her pledge to solve the problem as quickly as possible. “That’s the word from our leadership and the president. The president is going to hold us here until we’re done.”
Several proposals have been floated in both the House and the Senate for additional provisions onto the payroll tax holiday extension, such as the Keystone Pipeline, an oil pipeline from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico.
Schakowsky wants none of it. She claims it is political maneuvering when people are suffering.
Republicans Poking President in the Eye, Schakowsky Says
“There is no reason to do this except to poke the president in the eye,” she said of the additions by Republicans. “He, the president, was pretty clear in what he had to say.”
Dold also favors a payroll tax holiday and an extension of unemployment benefits. Though he has not indicated he favors adding anything to either piece of legislation, he is keeping his mind open to all possibilities.
“As there are multiple plans being circulated in Washington, Congressman Dold is open to looking at these options and others as long as they include the appropriate pay-fors,” said Stefani Zimmerman, Dold congressional communications director.
While Dold is keeping his options open, one change Schakowsky said she will not countenance is shortening the period for extended unemployment benefits from 99 weeks to 59 weeks as some Republicans have proposed.
“It’s very upsetting; they will undo this for the people who need it most,” Schakowsky said. “It’s not going to pass the Senate and the president is not going to sign it into law,” she added citing a need for less partisanship and more legislation.
Though Dold continues to be willing to consider all options, his re-election campaign was sharply critical of Schneider for claiming Dold has helped block a payroll tax holiday extension, would reduce the disposable income of people in Illinois and increase burdens to the middle class.
“Brad Schneider is either completely uninformed or completely disingenuous,” said Jon Blessing, Dold campaign spokesman. “In either case the 10th District does not deserve this type of careless and false rhetoric.”
Schneider admits Dold has not voted against extending the payroll tax holiday but contends the congressman has voted to keep the measure from coming to a vote three times. He thinks this action will increase the middle class tax burden.
“On three separate occasions Dold voted to block a vote on the bill,” Schneider said. “This is the same as voting against it. If the bill doesn’t pass, a family earning $50,000 a year will be $1,000 out of pocket.”
Schneider, Sheyman and Tree Weigh in
Schneider and two of his primary opponents, Waukegan community organizer Ilya Sheyman and Long Grove business owner John Tree, oppose adding the Keystone Pipeline to legislation extending the payroll tax holiday.
“The Keystone Pipeline is a distraction that is delaying a tax cut for millions of working and middle class families that the Republicans want to hold hostage to the Big Oil agenda,” Tree said.
Sheyman not only wants an extension of unemployment benefits and a continuation of the payroll tax holiday, but he also would like to see legislation to create new jobs. He would pay for his ideas by more heavily taxing the wealthiest Americans.
"We need to provide a life vest to middle class families drowning in this economy by passing major new federal jobs legislation, extending unemployment benefits and a short-term extension of the payroll tax cut,” Sheyman said. “We should pay for it by rolling back the Bush tax cuts."
Schneider shares Schakowsky’s sense of urgency and fears a delay by Congress could have serious effects on American workers.
“Inaction on this issue will cost jobs, potentially take us back into recession, and put working families already struggling to make ends meet closer to the edge,” he said. “Congress must address this issue now.”
One other Democratic candidate contending for Dold’s seat, Mundelein attorney Vivek Bavda, did not respond to Patch’s request for comments on these issues.
Daniel Krudop
7:58 am on Monday, December 12, 2011
I think the "payroll tax holiday" would be better understood if it were described as reducing payments into the Social Security Trust Fund. We have a "Trust" fund that has about $2.6 Trillion in IOU's. The "trust"ees have "invested" all or most of the funds in Treasury notes so the Government can spend the money for general purposes.
Due to the current economic conditions, many individuals are choosing to take their SSA benefits early which will draw down the fund faster than projected. That means accelerated borrowing from China or accelerated printing of Dollars to convert the IOU's to cash for payment of SSA benefits. The brilliant idea we have come up with is to reduce the payments into the fund from future recipients. That means, for every dollar in reduced payments, the Government will have to borrow a dollar from China or print more. I'm willing to bet that those who will pay less into the system will expect a full return when they are eligible. It's no wonder that most people under forty don't expect they will receive any SSA benefits when they retire.
Gale Teschendorf
1:13 pm on Monday, December 12, 2011
"Congressional Inaction Could Cost Local Citizens" or better said would be Congressional Inaction Could *SAVE* Illinois Citizens. For every 4 dollars that Illinois sends to DC, we get only 3 back. Thank you Mark & Jan, Illinois is probably better off with out those billions - not. If Illinois had the first primary in the nation would we get $2 back for every $1 we send in like Iowa does now?
Illinois pays more than it's fair share, I say no more spending increases until we are on par with the other states.
Keith Sanderson
10:02 am on Monday, December 12, 2011
It is ironic that Jan Schakowsky is is so concerned about taxing the "middle class", but her Democratic chohorts didn't blink an eye when they raised the state income tax last year which effectively wiped out any monetary gain the citizens of Illinois could have gained from the Federal tax reduction.
Since I am already collecting social security I am not too concerned about the current reduction in reducing payments into the social security trust fund. However, anyone a few years younger than me should be careful of what they wish before they cry to have this "tax holiday" extended. They are just robbing your future.
Of course as a congresswoman Jan doesn't have to worry about social security because she doesn't participate in the program. Maybe she and the other members of Congress should be forced to participate in the SS program. They might not be so eager to blow our trust.
Louise Moore
10:10 am on Monday, December 12, 2011
You are so right Daniel. They call it a benefit for working people to make it sound and look like it is helping citizens put more dollars in their pocket when in reality it is reducing the money going into the Social Security fund for workers future benefits. And then they attach other big spending bills to it. Sleezy, Sleezy over and over. Average person pays no attention and that is the problem on so many subjects before Congress.
Deadcatbounce
11:37 am on Monday, December 12, 2011
"one change Schakowsky said she will not countenance is shortening the period for extended unemployment benefits from 99 weeks to 59 " ... of course she wants it extended to 99 weeks because as long as she can keep giving out money, people will vote for her. Why work if you can sit home and collect a check
Gale Teschendorf
9:27 pm on Monday, December 12, 2011
Deadcatbounce, next you will say tax the 50% who currently pay no federal income tax.
If I were a Republican, I would say extend the tax one more year so the economy would not start producing more until after the election. As long as many people are not willing to work because unemployment is paying 1/2 of what they were making, we may see a slower than normal recovery.
Donny
5:28 pm on Monday, December 12, 2011
I move we add a new word to the English language, Schakowsky: (verb) to cheat on others in an ignorant way, to act or take action in the opposite of common sense.
RB
8:22 pm on Monday, December 12, 2011
How can Dold 'be open to all ideas"? He signed Grover's pledge.if an idea has any form of revenue increase, he has already said No. Some people forget that he pledged to Grover before he even took his oath of office. Oh, and Jan had nothing to do with the Illinois legislators voting to raise taxes in Illinois.
Daniel Krudop
6:50 am on Tuesday, December 13, 2011
Federalist No. 45
“The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State. --- The regulation of commerce, it is true, is a new power; but that seems to be an addition which few oppose, and from which no apprehensions are entertained.”
I've always wondered if the Commerce Clause was a Trojan Horse surreptitiously placed in the Constitution by the supporters of a massive, all-powerful central government that would control the lives of the citizens in every and all aspects of their lives. The current interpretation of the Commerce Clause makes the entire paragraph preceding the final sentence moot as it does the tenth amendment.
“The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public’s money.” Democracy in America. Tocqueville.
Jose
11:36 am on Tuesday, December 13, 2011
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS SHOULD CONTINUE UNTIL CONGRESS AND CORPORATIONS END THE OUTSOURCING OF OUR JOBS TO CHINA---ASIA--MEXICO...WHEN THEY STOP THE OUTSOURCING OF THE JOBS ? END UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS.
Gale Teschendorf
2:33 pm on Tuesday, December 13, 2011
http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s1007.pdf
says that US manufacturing has increased more than 20% since 2000 adjusted for inflation.
Jose
11:42 am on Tuesday, December 13, 2011
NOW THE HOLIDAY PAY ROLL TAX CUT ?? I DON'T CARE..WE NEED TAX DOLLARS TO PAY DOWN THE DEBT, THE FAT CATS DON'T WANT TO HELP OUT, SO LET THE MIDDLE CLASS DO IT.. I'M A LOW MIDDLE CLASS GUY. LET THE HOLIDAY TAX EXPIRED. NOT A BIG DEAL, JUST BE HAPPY YOU STILL HAVE A JOB. REMEMBER WHO SAID, IS NOT WHAT THE COUNTRY CAN DO FOR YOU---IS WHAT YOU CAN DO FOR THE COUNTRY....THE FAT CATS DON'T KNOW THE MEANING OF THAT. JFK.
Pat Craig
1:33 pm on Tuesday, December 13, 2011
Jose', Congress doesn't outsource jobs, although their punitive actions toward business DO cause businesses to leave, (along with many other foolish legislation). Also, the "tax cut" actually negatively impacts the contributions to Social Security which the politicians have raided over time.
Government is not the solution... government is the problem.
Mara Meyer
4:44 pm on Wednesday, December 14, 2011
Perhaps we should rethink all representatives and senators from IL as they seem to only work for THEIR OWN BENEFIT!