Hang on while we load the rest of the page...
 
 

District 219 Passes 8.22 Percent Levy Increase

Administrators say actual increase in taxes will be lower

 

Niles Township High School District 219 school board unanimously passed a $131.4 million 2011 tax levy Dec. 12.

The levy, which is the amount District 219 is asking Cook County to collect for it next year, is 8.22 percent higher than the $121.4 million in property taxes the district collected this year, according to documents provided by the school district.

But taxpayers shouldn’t get too upset yet, school officials said.

Earlier: District 219’s budget is 6.86 percent higher

The district’s ultimate tax extension for next year – that is, the amount it will actually collect – will show a smaller increase, said School Board President Robert Silverman. That’s because the Illinois Property Tax Extension Limitation Law of 1991 does not allow local governments such as school districts to increase the amount they collect by more than the rate of inflation or 5 percent, which ever is lower, plus the taxes collected on new property.

Last year’s increase in the consumer price index was 1.5 percent, so that is the average increase that most homeowners should see, said Paul O’Neill, the assistant superintendent for business services. Because Niles Township is mostly built out, there won’t be too much in the way of new property added to the tax rolls.

However, some property could come out off Tax Increment Financing districts, which are set up to encourage redevelopment by setting aside any increased taxes to benefit the TIF area. TIF districts have a finite lifespan, and when they expire, the new value of the property within them gets added to the general tax roles.

Local governments such as school districts generally levy — or request — more money than they believe they can get under the tax cap, because they want to get every dollar possible. That’s not only because they want the money for next year, but because the tax extension for each year is based on the year before. That means that levying for less money than a district can legally receive would cut into the amount it could receive in every subsequent year.

Silverman said the district has generally asked for much, much more money than it could receive — sometimes up to a 20 percent increase — even though officials knew their requests were not realistic.

An 8 percent increase is also highly unlikely, Silverman acknowledged. Still, he said, “I feel much better that the gap is narrower.”

District 219 includes Niles West and Niles North high schools. Want more news? Like your local Patch on Facebook.

What do you think of the increase? Tell us in the comments.

Clark Kent

7:11 am on Monday, December 19, 2011

"District 219 Passes 8.22 Percent Levy Increase --Administrators say actual increase in taxes will be lower" Political and "administrator" logic.......

Increase = Decrease

"Silverman said the district has generally asked for much, much more money than it could receive – sometimes up to a 20 percent increase – even though officials knew their requests were not realistic." Leadership! "Administration!" Everybody's playing a money game among themselves...and THEY are always the "much, much" winner!

Lower than the higher !!!!!! Hohoheeheehahahah! What a great bunch they are!

Such Holiday cheer. NTHS "administrators" version of "Comedy Central."

Er...Will actual increase in salaries for "administrators" be lower?

Could this lead to "Occupy NTHS?"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Dj-4RYjbdY

Reply

Earl Weiss

7:20 am on Monday, December 19, 2011

"But taxpayers shouldn’t get too upset yet, school officials said."

Too late.
We are way past upset already. They told us they were in financial trouble and they load the place with flat screen TVs and electronic signs. They told us we all need to make sacrifices and the last Superintendant was the literal Sun Times front page poster child for spending excess. They told us they need to raise fees because they can't get a tax rate increase, and then when they get it they don't roll back fees.
They are going broke but still get raises all aroung, (Average Salary over $100K)new press boses, gymnastics center, and aquatic center. Yep, we beleive what they say. Right along with the easter bunny and Santa coming.

Reply

Dan Goldberg

8:58 am on Monday, December 19, 2011

School administrators are asking for every dollar possible because each new year tax extention is based on previous years? By this formula, the increases are no longer based on reality but motivated on spending as much as you can and will eventually tax us all out of our homes (since most of us aren't getting the six figure salaries of the administrators). Here's a thought, what about running schools like we run our households by setting up a budget and spending based on actual needs and ability to pay? Forget about the kids occupying anything, how about the parents occupy the schools district board meetings and start asking some hard questions. Maybe one of those would be to the elected boards such as "What are you thinking?"

Reply

Earl Weiss

9:21 am on Monday, December 19, 2011

"By this formula, the increases are no longer based on reality but motivated on spending as much as you can".
For 219 and 73.5, in recent memory it's always been this way, except of course when they spend more than they can.
They have never had a revenue problem, only an excessive spending problem.

Reply
Comment_arrow

M. Kim Jr.

10:18 am on Monday, December 19, 2011

There must be a way to hold those responsible for untethered increases responsible. But I don't think those elected to school boards have enough experience or the will to tell the superintendents to stop needless spending. Maybe the only way is to elect to school boards those who will. When is the next election? North Korea just lost a dictator so maybe its time for regime changes in the schools too!

Comment_arrow

Dan Goldberg

10:22 am on Monday, December 19, 2011

The process to achieve spending levels for what you need based in reality is called "zero based budgeting". It seems that lesson has been forgotten. Maybe those running the schools whether paid or elected need to be reminded that taxpayer money is precious and shouldn't be wasted, especially now.

Clark Kent

11:26 am on Monday, December 19, 2011

@ M. Kim Jr.

"Maybe the only way is to elect to school boards those who will. When is the next election?"

If you run I will campaign for you as I will for those who share your sentiments.

"North Korea just lost a dictator so maybe its time for regime changes in the schools too!"

Agreed. And change the self-praising, coffee-mug carrying desk-sitters aka "administrators," too! They are nothing but the willing co-conspirators with the Board.

Sadly I have little positive expectations for those that suffer under the Commie filth in N. Korea. That part of the peninsula hasn't been safe since 1910!

Now for some "fun." Watch the clip http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZFsveAi47I .
Hear Superintendent Mike talk about his "passion for leadership" and how he wants to help children and PARENTS grow! In 2010 he was in North Shore Dist 112 as an "assistant" @ $173,388/yr. Now he's the "leader" in Pennoyer (Harlem and Foster) having replace Tommy Zafirtas ($216,780/yr).

In 2009 at Pennoyer there were 417 STUDENTS and 28 TEACHERS. Such numbers obviously mean they're all overworked and underpaid!

Supt. Mike apparently has additional passions.

Reply

grandpa

4:05 pm on Monday, December 19, 2011

Since the current board members apparently haven't received the memo that responsible taxing bodies are REDUCING their levy, (see Morton Grove Library and Village of Morton Grove), perhaps a referendum to recall the entire sitting 219 board is in order. It's too late for the spring elections but doable for this coming fall. Throw the bums out!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Clark Kent

7:09 pm on Monday, December 19, 2011

Partially supported by "The Daily Planet"---

Time to "Occupy NTHS School Board Room!"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q59ZcFguUOo

Comment_arrow

Gina

3:55 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Count me in. I will vote for you.

Morton Grove

1:26 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012

In 2004, my morton grove taxes were about $4600. In 2009, they were $9500. They have more-than-doubled in just 5 years. Meanwhile, my home value has plummeted to where it was at around 2001. Can someone on this board post some info for me, and others, as to where I can start going to show up and make noise about the local school boards' tax levies?

I'm scared of being taxed out of my home, and I've been a Morton Grove resident my entire life. There's a handful of school board members, and tens of thousands of MG and Skokie residents. Us vs. them. Let's put some people in there who are sympathetic to the current plight of all homeowners.

High schools do not turn out better students because of flat screen TVs and aquatic centers, and state-of-the-art what have yous. My point is that such a level of spending is unnecessary. It is mostly irrelevant to real, authentic learning experiences, and wholly incongruent to the financial capabilities of the community supporting it, particularly in these economic times.

**The cost of running a town and supporting a school district- however excellent we want to make it- has absolutely not doubled between 2004 and 2009, and yet we have collectively doubled the money we give them.** And most of it is going to the school districts. It's ridiculous.

Reply

Earl Weiss

2:15 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012

"Morton Grove
1:26 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012

In 2004, my morton grove taxes were about $4600. In 2009, they were $9500. They have more-than-doubled in just 5 years. Meanwhile, my home value has plummeted to where it was at around 2001".

Geez, don't you rememner how part of the push for the unneeded tax increase was their premise that higher taxes will preserve and enhance property values.

Sadly, to many ot the taxpayer voters bought what they were selling or were too apathetic.

Reply
Comment_arrow

grandpa

2:41 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012

The board at 219 is not unlike many of the other school boards in the area, (see the kerfluffle regarding Dist 67). Most of these officials know that they do not have to worry about the taxpayers, because, unlike the teachers union, taxpayers are not organized and don't give hefty political donations. And, besides... it's ALWAYS "for the children".

Until there is an organized taxpayers revolt, nothing will change and property taxes, the lion's share of which are for schools, will continue to escalate.

Leave a comment

 
 
 
 

Your town. Mobilized.

Download Patch for iPhone or Patch Places for Android.

Learn more 

Own a local business?

Stay in touch with customers by claiming your free Patch listing.

Learn more 

Advertise on Patch

Build community trust in your local brand with game-changing tools for any budget.

Learn how