Keith,
All of the journalists are working for CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC and so this is what the Americans believe. Its a fraud being played every day around the World.
We were attacked and it takes the current administration over a week to stop lying about it. If Israel feels Obama is a winner watch them go into action and force his hand.

Well first of all, fast and furious is not quite what the right wing pundits have made it out to be and not worth the uproar caused by Issa. Second, I don't believe Obama pulled the trigger or killed the US ambassador. But if you think that's worth impeachment, then I'm sure you believed the same for Bush would have been appropriate- going to war on false pretenses, covering up information regarding Hussein and Bin Laden, lying about weapons of mass destruction, and torturing prisoners. Surely impeachable offenses that the Obama administration let the Bush administration get away with.

Here is an AIPAC publication devoted entirely to not ranking candidates. Yessiree cuz aipac doesn't do that, and also doesn't spy for Israel.

http://peacenow.org/entries/does_aipac_rate_candidates_you_decide#.UG4Xepg0WSo

I have to agree with RB on this one. The media is not liberal, it is statist.

Whether a particular statist position is liberal or conservative matters not. The free and independent media is subservient to our betters within the Total State.

What's proven everyday? Republicans put Ideology over Jobs, Rights, Lives and Laws. Mr. Schneider has agreed to compromise when necessary for the good of the Country. That's what's needed. Not more of the same extreme social agenda ideology of the New Republican Party.

There IS a sucker born every minute. Mac, you really need to broaden your horizons.
By the way, why didn't you answer my question about Florida? You know, I asked what has happened there recently regarding the election. I'm sure you have time to look it up.

For some reason you think a Democrat always gets a Government check. That's an interesting view point. My father for instance fought in the South Pacific in WW2 so you would have the freedom to write your right wing Fox News jibberish. Yes, when he retired he got Social Security each month and after he fell ill and went through all his savings he died just before we were going to have him set to draw on Medicaid. My mother? Well she did draw Medicaid in the last 3 months of her life since they had spent all their savings caring for my dad. you seem agree with Romney and Ryan that Medicaid should be cut, I whole heartily disagree with you. By the way, they were both pretty much Republican voters. I would say they were more Republican than you'll ever be. Their Republican party no longer exists.
This right wing ideology about Democrats spending everyone's tax dollars giving it away to people is simply wrong.

Where were all the job creators when W was in office. He cut their taxes, but jobs were lost nevertheless.

You cannot evaluate tax policy and jobs in isolation as if they are in a vacuum.

Two reasons for the disconnect under Shrub are a massive increase in the regulatory burden and massive misallocation of capital stemming from Fed policies.

http://reason.com/archives/2008/12/10/bushs-regulatory-kiss-off

Please do. This ought to be fun.

What are you talking about? Which part do you find biased? Please be specific, thanks.

It's not those who are opposed to Obama for legitimate reasons. It is those who believe he is a communist socialist Kenyan who wants to take everyone's guns away and turn America into an Islamic dictatorship. The ones who believe he hasn't shown his true birth certificate, he's a drug addict, and lets see, what else? Oh, and he took sole credit for Bin Laden, not mentioning the SEALS at all. Those are the ones who watch Fox daily for their "news". And Obamacare is not taking everyone's money as has been suggested.

@mosober, it was your blanket statement about the liberal press. Those are simply right wing talking points....so there you go. Have yourself a great day now, watch that remote....you might end up on Chris Matthews, Rachel, Rev. Sharpton or others that will probably give you a truthful headache. You Stick to fair and balanced, I'll stick to the truth.

RB, while not as blatantly as Fox, those you mentioned can go over the top! Not the absurdity that Fox passes as news, but they can be somewhat annoying and embellish their reporting. Overall though, the "liberal press" does not exist as republicans see it.

Uh, Mosober what the h--l are you talking about? It seems you may be the one who agrees with everything the right wing propaganda machine reports.

Who are "the normal" in this country?

Maybe mo'sober ain't so....mo. I have no clue what he's talking about.....and he votes, that's what's scary. To each his own. I don't bite at such bait.

Wrong again McCloud. Under Bush an immediate loss of Private Sector jobs started upon his taking office AND an immediate growth in Public Sector jobs began. So, Bush basically was consistent with one thing. Loss of Private Sector Jobs throughout his term in office, not just at the end due to housing. Interesting that he also started growing Public Sector jobs pretty much from the beginning too. Isn't that exactly different than you and your Conservatives wanted? Spin doesn't hide the facts. Oh, and under Obama Public sector Government jobs have dropped and private sector jobs have increased. Dang, those facts gettin in the way of your horse again.

Okay Mac-

http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/07/17/the-truth-about-the-bush-tax-cuts-and-job-growth/2/

http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/01/20/lowest-job-growth-since-wwii-under-george-w-bush/

How about reading these. You may learn a little something.

Still waiting to see if you know what's going on in Florida. Funny, the right wing and Fox don't seem to be reporting on this much, so I'll understand if you don't know.

Sully, you cannot look at tax policy and job growth in a vacuum.

Two reasons for the disconnect under Shrub are a massive increase in the regulatory burden and massive misallocation of capital stemming from Fed policies.

http://reason.com/archives/2008/12/10/bushs-regulatory-kiss-off

Shrub was a big government disaster. That is independent from his relatively improved tax policy.

I'm not sure I buy your premise, Guido. I read the article you posted, but while there is some validity to it, I personally don't believe this had much to do with the GDP. Bush's tax cuts did not increase employment or lower the deficit.

I get it that you aren't a big Bush fan, and I appreciate your honesty. We just seem to interpret things a little differently. And I am. It a big fan of Obama, but compared to Romney, I'd rather go with what we got. People like McCloud don't seem to understand that their taxes will be going up under Romney. The job creators, who really aren't, will gain more financial, economic, and political power while the "little people" (including the 47 percent) will be the ones paying for it. There is absolutely no way the deficit will go down under Romney. I'm also willing to bet that should he become president, the republicans won't quite care as much about the deficit as they do now. They certainly didn't under Bush.

Oops, typos on my last post. What I was saying is I am not a big fan of Obama.

Oh, so it's only Obama's fault if the current tax expires? I seem to remember some republicans involved as well. But poor babies, they just couldn't stand up to that meanie Obama. Instead, they just decided to filibuster anything and everything, put secret holds on bills and appointments, and basically just sit back and do nothing for four years that may help the American people. Mac won't believe this of course because the tea party is the only absolutely and completely honest entity. If we had just listened to them, the credit rating wouldn't have been dropped. All the discourse between the two parties had nothing to do with it. Just those darn democrats.

You said Bush only lost jobs due to the housing crisis. I called you on it. I'm a communist for calling you out? Not!

GDP is a useless statistic. Anything that treats $1 of government spending as a product is bound to be useless.

Employment and real income growth are much better measurements.

What are you talking about Mac?

http://economyinperspective.com/gdp

Average annual GDP from highest to lowest.

Kennedy/Johnson 5.2%

Clinton 3.7%

Carter 3.4%

Reagan 3.3%

Nixon/Ford 2.7%

Eisenhower 2.3%

Obama 2.1% (as of 08/12)

GHW Bush 1.9%

Truman 1.8%

GW Bush 1.7%

Look at Public Sector vs. Private Sector like I did. You may be surprised, don't spin the numbers. One sector costs taxpayers and one creates economy improving jobs. Guess which Bush added and which one lost jobs? Yep, everyone gets it but mosober and McCloud. Bush added Public Sector and killed Private sector. Tinkle down economics.

12 years of trickle down? Not theory. Does not work. Where are the jobs? Both Reagan and Bush 41 had to raise spending and debt to fight recession caused by Trickle down. Bush 43 raised spending to fight recession and left office right when things crashed. Let's try theory, trickle down facts are not helping.

Ryan can't even explain Ryanomics! Not even on Fox? He got tripped up like a school kid caught cheating. $5 trillion in tax breaks and they promise revenue neutral? Makes no sense to anyone, even Chris Wallace on Fox." Loopholes, we'll tell you later which ones" right. There, not a word about Bush.

.....and the white working class male, and the female vote..have you even read any polls?

Mac- Idea, maybe you email Mitt. Give him some Zingers! That's what he's collecting for the debates. If you want to stretch yourself why don't you explain Ryanomics to him. Ryan seems to be unable to explain it. Zingers! That's it. No facts or details...zingers!

I thought that Univision stunt was great. Darkening his skin, screaming at the commentators - great stuff!

Hmm, I wonder what percentage of the US is comprised of blacks, gays, women, unions, and Hispanics. Couldn't be very high, right?

I think this is the Univision interview Mac is referring to.

http://reason.com/blog/2012/09/21/univision-gives-obama-first-serious-gril

Attention media, this is what a real interview looks like.

I disagree about that too, Guido. GDP isn't useless. Also, Univision interviewed both candidates. According to reports, Romney got angry when the interviewers didn't do what he wanted them to do.

.....and all because of Bush 43 and 40 years of living off of debt.

http://money.cnn.com/2012/06/22/news/economy/obama-spending/index.htm

Hey Mac, something else for you to read.

But Rich is proud to give his name and let everyone know just how ridiculous he is. However, I've suspected as well. They are awfully similar.

Is Emmanuel Goldstein hiding under your bed?

Last week I was Schulte, now it's Mac? Make up your mind for the object of your two minutes hate.

The alliance between Israel and the religious right is pretty scary. Israel wants the money and military might, and the religious right wants Israel so it can be converted. Without Israel in hand, the second coming can't come (or something like that). Israel's making a deal with the devil in this case.

The "religious right" wants to convert Israel? Without Israel there is no "second coming?" Where are you getting this stuff? Do you see black helicopters when you leave your house too?

J-Street wants Israel to pull back to pre-1967 borders and negotiate with its enemies who want simply to exterminate Israel off the face of the earth?

Now THAT IS SCARY! And Schneider endorses those J-Street positions? Or does he just endorse J-Street which happens to take such positions? Can someone make sense out of that position?

Perhaps Patch should ask Schneider harder questions about his real positions instead of giving him a forum to alibi?

Of course you were. The wack job site this came from was the US Department of Commerce.

Ever heard of John Hagee, Mac? Here, let me help you out on this one.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0508/10375.html

http://www.jhm.org/

Here's more for you, Mac-

http://www.theocracywatch.org/christian_zionism.htm

http://www.theocracywatch.org/christian_zionism_dispensationalism.htm

In order for the end times to occur in which Christ will return to Earth, Israel has to be in Jewish hands. Of course when Christ does come back, Jews will have to convert or be killed.