- Local every day in
Morrison Places Emphasis on Job Creation; Sumption Adds in Fiscal Discipline, Education
Candidates answer questions at Sunday forum in Lake Bluff.
The 29th Senate District, which encompasses Deerfield, Highland Park, Glencoe, Glenview, Lake Forest, Lake Bluff, Niles and Northbrook, has a choice in the March 20 primary between two Democratic candidates: the current Deerfield Township supervisor and a Lake Bluff business consultant with a business, finance and governmental background.
Julie Morrison, of Deerfield, has been the West Deerfield Township supervisor for 15 years. She received the endorsement of the person currently holding the office, Susan Garrett, who announced her retirement in July.
Sumption joined the race in December, but recently picked up the endorsement of U.S. Senator Tom Daschel. The Lake Bluff resident worked for Daschle as a legislative assistant, and holds an M.B.A. from Columbia Business School along with more than 15 years working in finance of businesses.
The two candidates answered questions in Sunday's candidate forum sponsored by the League of Women Voters-Lake Forest/Lake Bluff Area (LWV) and Lake Forest-Lake Bluff Patch at Lake Bluff Elementary School. The questions were drawn from the LWV, Patch and audience members. Here is a cross-section of those questions and their responses.
- Do you favor the expansion of gambling, a casino in Lake County?
Milton Sumption:
“I would have opposed the gaming bills that were proposed last year in Springfield. I don’t believe the state legislature did any kind of market study for those bills. What was proposed, all of different gaming including in Lake County, was far more capacity than this market could have absorbed. It would have hurt the existing properties and made the new ones suffer as well. I think we should focus economic policy on other industries that offer growth including technology, health care and alternative energy. I would be open to considering other proposals on gaming.”
Julie Morrison:
“Gaming offers a new stream of revenue for communities and states. I would have the decision made on a site by site basis. Casino needs to be placed in a community that has the will of the community to have it in. There has to be tremendous oversight so we aren’t getting the kind of corruption or bad neighbors that can come in with organized gaming. Let’s figure out where we are going to put the revenue. It should be specified as to where it’s going and then tracked very carefully. Lottery was a good example. That money was supposed to go to schools, it didn’t.”
- How do you plan to fix Medicaid? Do you support cuts to providers or cuts to service?
Julie Morrison:
“Not too long ago, I sat down with Julie Hamos, who is the director of the Dept. of Health and Human Services. We talked about Medicaid. It’s a huge budget item for the State. It’s going to be a program that grows. We need to figure out ways to control the cost and make it very efficient and effective. Fraud is one very easy way that we can begin to control it. Julie told me that when she sent post cards or mailings to all the Medicaid recipients in Illinois, six percent came back as non-deliverable. That means those people were either dead, didn’t live here or maybe have never lived here. That is a very good place to start on Medicaid reform."
Milton Sumption:
"I believe obviously Medicaid and Medicare are important services that citizens of the state need. We need to figure out how to continue providing those services. In terms of managing future Medicaid/Medicare expenses, health care costs are growing far too fast. We need to figure out how to manage those costs. One, eliminate waste and abuse. There are hundreds of millions of dollars potentially that we could save in terms of waste and abuse. Look at the type of care being provided. We need to focus on wellness programs and other testing to make sure people under those programs are staying well, and avoid not getting treatment when they need it and then ultimately going to the emergency room. That’s the most expensive care we can provide. We need wellness programs."
- What areas of pensions would you reform, such as police, fire, teachers and public employee pensions?
Julie Morrison:
“Pension reform is probably the question people ask me the most. If we don’t reform pension now, there won’t be pension availability for those people who have already earned it. We’re really at the breaking point. The viability of the system is absolutely in our face. If I was state senator right now and had the power, I would put the unions, legislative leaders, someone from governor’s office in a large room, with no windows and one door, and have everyone sit there until there is consensus. No one is going to walk out of there happy. Everyone is going to give a little something. We are absolutely at critical mass. Everything is on the table, and everyone is going to have to give something.”
Milton Sumption:
“The huge pension estimate is at $86 billion. My first comment is it’s egregious, sinful, and immoral that the State legislature did not fund pensions year after year after year. If I go fortunate to go to Springfield, I am going to stop that type of irresponsible practice. It’s just simply immoral. In terms of fixing, I think putting people in a room and locking them in there is not necessarily a solution. We do need to sit all parties down, we need ideas from both sides of the aisle, and we need to come up with a long term solution that is fair to employees and the taxpayers and one that is sustainable through all economic cycles. One of my proposals to find the revenue to fund the pensions is through public-private partnerships.”
- Do you support either an increase in the state income tax or a constitutional amendment allowing a graduated income tax as a partial solution to Illinois pension funding crisis?
Milton Sumption:
“On the state income tax, I wouldn’t favor any increase from where we are right now. A year ago as I’m sure you are all well aware, state income taxes increased from 3 percent to 5 percent. What was lacking in that measure was any kind of real budget cuts. In order to balance a state or federal budget, you have to have not only some increased revenue but also meaningful budget cuts. The bill also lacked any mechanism to impose fiscal discipline on the state legislature. We need that. We need some fiscal discipline. In terms of a graduated income tax, I would support amending the constitution to have a progressive tax system in the state.”
Julie Morrison:
"I agree with a lot of what Milton said. We need to reign in our budget. That’s first and foremost. I have 15 years experience in balancing a budget. That’s just discipline and priorities, and sticking to it. I would be in favor of looking at a graduated income tax. I think it will more fairly balance the financial responsibility the state has gotten into."
- What are your top three legislative priorities?
Julie Morrison:
“First would be jobs. I think the whole economy will improve once more people are back at work. I have done some work in this area at the township level. We brought together public and private groups. I did an employment clinic. We had a staffing agency providing job coaching, Chamber of Commerce was present and a Rotary who would provide assistance in paying for classes. We had College of Lake County there. There are skills that people can get from community college s for jobs that are open today. We need to have relevant training for jobs that are open now.”
Milton Sumption:
“First, I would agree with Julie, fixing our economy and creating jobs is critical. I have spent over15 years in the private sector in business finance. I understand economic policy. I understand what is important to companies when they are looking at a location to do business, and developing policies that will facilitate economic growth. Secondly, imposing some fiscal discipline in Springfield. We need to get our budget balanced and find a solution to the pension mess. Third, education. I am sitting before you because I have been blessed with a great education. I believe we need to provide a great education to our children. They will need it to compete for jobs in the 21st century.”
- Utilities are currently often unresponsive. Telephone systems are hard to negotiate. Local offices are often not available. It’s almost impossible to reach a human being. How could you improve matters?
Julie Morrison:
“I was one of those people like you were who lost their power. ComEd , what a disaster that was. Our current legislators have done a pretty good job of taking ComEd to the mat. There are state regulations over utilities. We need to hold their feet to the fire and make them accountable to us, the consumer. It was absolutely ridiculous the way people were treated. There was no response time that was acceptable. A state senator should not be the one calling ComEd so you get your line re-established. That being said, I love to mix it up with people like that. Taking care of the constituents needs is really important. Constituents’ services are something I will really seek my teeth into.”
Milton Sumption:
“I believe ComEd needs to do a much better job servicing customers. We need to hold companies like ComEd accountable. They are essentially a monopoly here. They operate at the privilege of the people of Illinois. I, too, would work extremely hard on constituent services. When I worked in Washington, D.C. for U.S. Senator Tom Daschle, that was my focus. Helping constituents in the state navigate the federal bureaucracy to get the services they need. I would certainly go to the mat for people in the district in dealing with companies like ComEd.”
- What can be done to ensure the state does not go after financial resources at the local government level to pay its bills?
Milton Sumption:
“Springfield is looking for revenue wherever it can find it. We need to come up with more creative solutions rather than go to municipalities to find revenue for programs for things like funding pensions. To find other revenue sources to help fund, for example pensions and balance the budget, we need to look at private-public partnership to generate royalty revenue that can be dedicated to meeting the state’s funding needs. We need to work on growing our economy and create jobs, if we have an expanding tax base in the state, that will generate revenue to meet the state’s needs. We need to be very conscious of our municipalities and their needs.”
Julie Morrison:
“I bet that question was aimed at school districts. There is a concept that school districts are a place that the state might be going to in paying teacher pensions that are not fully funded. I was at a meeting in Highland Park last week and I heard the school district representative stand up and yell, no, we can’t afford this. As a local municipality who has a budget, who has a levy and an extension, I think the state should not be looking at local municipalities to make up for their mistakes.”
LeeYWhite
5:37 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012
Healthcare is not subject to normal market forces! Anything that you have to buy at any random moment in order not to die is not something to which a rational supply/demand calculus can apply. Check out "Penny Health" articles on how to reduce the cost of insurance.
Ed Collins
10:15 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012
Congratulations to Patch Editor Jim Powers for the insightful story above. While I was not able to attend last Sunday's debate at the Lake Bluff Elementary School, I did follow it on your blog. This article does an excellent job in quoting the candidate's opinions in the District 29 State Senate race to succeed Sen. Susan Garrett. Let's have more of this. And, as a public service, have you - or a Patch Editorial Board - considered making endorsements to guide voters?
Jim Powers
11:00 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012
Hi Ed. Thanks for your question. The answer is we're not providing endorsements for the election. We will be producing a Voter Guide to assist in making sure the public has access to candidate information at their fingertips.
Deadcatbounce
1:47 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012
Mr. Sumption is a pretty ignorant person if he thinks the pension problem is due to the State legislature not funding pensions year after year after year or just in the pocket of the unions. Mr. Sumption let me give you a little history of this pension mess to help you out since you are taking the side of the unions in this scenario. So the following is for all those Mr. Sumptions out there that think this is just a funding problem …
Before 1970, there were few substantive changes to the pension rights granted to retirees. Afterward, the teacher unions worked their legislative magic and got increased benefit after increased benefit passed-starting immediately in 1971. It was like Custer at the Little Big Horn, except the taxpayers didn’t know about the slaughter until 40 years later. Continued …
Deadcatbounce
1:48 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012
Here is a partial list of the 130TRS pension enhancements passed by a compliant legislature at the expense of every Illinois taxpayer:
• 1971 – Pension maximum raised to 75% from 60%. Ogilvie
• 1971- Annual COLA raised to 2% from 1.5% Ogilvie
• 1971- No pension reduction if younger than 60 with 35 years service. Ogilvie
• 1972 – 85 sick days (1/2 year service) allowed for early retirement. Ogilvie
• 1973 – Survivor benefits paid at age 50 instead of 55. Ogilvie
• 1978 – Annual COLA raised to 3% from 2% (not compounded) Thompson
• 1979 – ERO (Early Retirement Option) allowed. Thompson
• 1980 – Retiree health insurance program established. Thompson
• 1982 – Employer pick-up of employee contributions allowed. Thompson
• 1983 – Unmarried children over 18 eligible for health insurance coverage. Thompson
• 1984 – Sick leave credit upped to 170 days from 85 days. Thompson
• 1990 – 3% COLA compounded. Thompson
• 1990 – Survivors get COLA. Thompson
• 1990 – Disability and pensions added for part-time and substitute teachers. Thompson
• 1991 – Retiree health care premiums 75% subsidy. Thompson
• 1998 – Waive Early Retirement cost – 34 work-years becomes 35 years for pension. Edgar
Deadcatbounce
1:49 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012
Every one of the above items added to taxpayer cost- $100′s of billions over the decades. Just the COLA going from 1.5% not compounded to 3% compounded increases the pension payout by 30% over a 30 year retirement life expectancy. Continued …
Based upon this 130 item, 40 year rap-sheet, teachers should be paying at least 15%.
Just the pension alone demands 13%, and the benefit enhancements are not limited to just pensions. In 1991 alone, there were enhancements for optional service credit, survivors’ annuities, disability retirement, backdating benefits by 90 days, and annual increases for revisionary annuities. Each one of these benefits adds to the cost of TRS pensions, and in none of these cases were the teachers asked to contribute more. Every single cost was borne by the taxpayer. Multiply this by over 100 other benefit increases since 1970 and taxpayers liability has increased enormously.
Deadcatbounce
1:54 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012
Julie Morrison … “As a local municipality who has a budget, who has a levy and an extension, I think the state should not be looking at local municipalities to make up for their mistakes”. So Ms Morrison you would say that pension padding by the local school districts in this area is not a local government problem?
Deadcatbounce
4:14 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012
According to Milton "One of my proposals to find the revenue to fund the pensions is through public-private partnerships. What does that mean?
Daniel Krudop
7:07 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012
Do you support either an increase in the state income tax or a constitutional amendment allowing a graduated income tax as a partial solution to Illinois pension funding crisis?
Milton Sumption: "I would support amending the constitution to have a progressive tax system in the state.”
How about amendig our Constitution to repeal the following:
Article XIII — General Provisions
Section 5. Pension and Retirement Rights
“Membership in any pension or retirement system of the State, any unit of local government or school district, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, shall be an enforceable contractual relationship, the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired.”
Shelly Jaffe
10:36 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012
After watching this video I think it's safe to say that Julie is not a viable option.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqSW-9rA-LE&list=UUSMZt-BfCjqr5WokhzY3S0A&index=1&feature=plcp
A
11:47 pm on Friday, May 4, 2012
A lot of teachers contribute to their pensions themselves. Just like anyone's retirement accounts. I have seen a paycheck of a deerfield educator and know that it is one of their deductions and not a benefit given to them. It is not their fault legislators have been spending out of the pension funds for years and not replacing it. In any other situation this would be called stealing wouldn't it? Spending money that doesn't belong to you?
A
11:53 pm on Friday, May 4, 2012
oh and to give people a figure...this person paid just about 5k into the pension system it last year and have done so for over 10 years. Fact of the matter is that is money that they will probably never see. All these employees have done with that money is throw it out the window with no choice. Keep in mind they dont pay social security.....THIS IS their social security (same concept but another name).
Our legislative system is turning very disheartening along with all of this bad publicity.
A
11:56 pm on Friday, May 4, 2012
So when the money is not yours and is supposed to be guaranteed....the only way you can guarantee it is to safely invest it............but spending it is evil....and even more evil is spending it and not replacing it.......and then telling people who depend on it for their retirement that they just wasted 10 years of their life contributing into something that wont be there.....and to start saving for retirement on the side while they are forced to still contribute.