.

Dold, Schneider Join Budget Debate

With scant support for bipartisan proposal, Dold votes for Ryan Republican budget. Schneider claims bill hurts seniors and middle class. Schakowsky also weighs in.

After joining a failed bipartisan effort to adopt a broad approach to rein in the country’s financial condition Wednesday,  of Illinois 10th Congressional District voted for the Republican House budget proposed by Thursday.

Dold’s decision to go along with the House Republican majority after the initial idea did not get much support from either party drew criticism from Deerfield management consultant in the Nov. 6 general election.

Dold joined a group of Democrats and Republicans to introduce a proposed budget for the next fiscal year based on recommendations two years ago by President Barack Obama’s deficit reduction commission, known as the Simpson-Bowles Commission.

The latest rendition of a bipartisan approach to the budget, know as Cooper-LaTourette, lost, 382-38.

“I support the Cooper-LaTourette budget because my constituents are crying out for us to find common ground and advance solutions on a bipartisan basis,” Dold said. “I was pleased to work with some of the Democrats on this serious proposal that puts everything on the table for discussion.”

The idea coupled spending cuts and entitlement reforms with changes to the tax structure.

Schneider called Dold’s decision to back the House Republican plan, which passed with a 228-191 vote, “unfortunate” because of its treatment of Medicare and the undue burden it places on middle class and older Americans.

“We should not balance the budget on the backs of families and seniors who can afford it the least, especially while we keep giving out tax breaks to those who simply do not need them,” Schneider said.

Schneider would begin by ending favorable tax treatment for companies which transfer jobs outside the country, reduce subsidies to oil companies and eliminate military spending already approved by Defense Secretary Leon Panetta.

“I know with smart policy decisions, we can cut spending and balance the budget in common sense ways that protect the middle class,” Schneider said. “We have an obligation to our children to get our deficit under control as well as a duty to our seniors to protect Medicare.”

Recognizing the House leaves Medicare intact for those 55 and over, Dold joined his fellow Republicans voting for the proposal because it helps contain the country’s debt.

“I voted to support the Republican budget proposal because this blueprint provides a clear vision of what this country needs to do to get our skyrocketing debt and deficits under control and put us back on a path to prosperity,” Dold said. “I appreciate the importance of both looking at the big picture and the pragmatic need to find a way to get things done.”  

U.S. Rep. Jan Schakowsky, a Democrat who represents Illinois 9th Congressional District, which includes Niles and much of Morton Grove, issued a statement:

“Today I voted against the irresponsible Republican budget resolution for fiscal year 2013. Budgets reflect priorities, and the Republicans' budget makes clear that their party puts the richest 1 percent as top priority and makes everyone else bear the burden. 

Republicans offered a similar budget last year and the American people rejected it. Instead of doing some soul-searching and re-examining their choices and priorities, Republicans have doubled-down. This budget ends the Medicare guarantee and will raise the already-high out-of-pocket spending for seniors, who have an average income of just $19,000 a year. It increases defense spending while slashing investments important to job creation, seniors, children, and the middle class, and places a cap on food assistance for the poor.

At the same time, this budget includes a tax plan that would give the average millionaire a tax break of $394,000. And because Republicans claim that tax changes would be revenue neutral, Republicans will have to raise taxes on the middle class and slash all domestic spending. In 2010, 93 percent of the additional income in the U.S., $288 billion, went to the top 1 percent of taxpayers. Meanwhile, the bottom 99 percent increased their income by an average of just 80 dollars. The Republican budget would do nothing to address income inequality. Instead, it would make it worse.

Americans want leadership from their government that would rebuild the middle class and put our economy on a strong footing for the future. The Republican budget does not reflect Americans' priorities. Fortunately, it will go no further than today's vote in the House.”

 

Richard Schulte March 31, 2012 at 02:22 PM
Schakowsky: “Today I voted against the irresponsible Republican budget resolution for fiscal year 2013. Budgets reflect priorities, and the Republicans' budget makes clear that their party puts the richest 1 percent as top priority and makes everyone else bear the burden." If we were to implement Representative Schakowsky's solution, and even if we raised taxes on the "rich" to 100 percent, we'd still have a budget problem. The real problem is that we have made promises to Americans that it simply not possible to keep. (The national debt exceeds 100 percent of GDP and continues to rocket higher. In other words, the US is bankrupt.) The politicians that represented us bought votes with promises of a free lunch-those politicians got re-elected and are now gone-America is stuck holding the bag of financial ruin. Congresswoman Schakowsky is one of those politicians who has her head in the sand and still can't admit (publicly) that their is a problem. We are faced with two choices-either address the problem or financial collapse, i.e. Greece. It is clear that Schakowsky favors the Greek solution-financial collapse of the United States. Yes, by all means, let's make every American homeless and penniless so that everybody will be equal. Of course, since Schakowsky is one our elite politicians, she won't be affected. A vote for Schakowsky is a vote for turning America into Greece. Excellent idea Jan.
Richard Schulte March 31, 2012 at 05:15 PM
Congresswoman Schakowsky: "Americans want leadership from their government that would rebuild the middle class and put our economy on a strong footing for the future." Didn't President Obama just submit a budget to Congress and didn't Congress just vote on President Obama's budget proposal? If I have my facts straight, and I do, not a single Democrat voted for President Obama's budget proposal-not even one Democrat voted to support the President. Yes, that's correct, not even Congresswoman Schakowsky voted for President Obama's budget proposal. Where is that leadership that Congresswoman Schakowsky is talking about in the excerpt above? Apparently, President Obama's budget proposal doesn't reflect the priorities of Americans. Say, isn't President Obama a Democrat? Why isn't Schakowsky bashing President Obama, instead of the Republicans? Isn't President Obama the one who submitted the budget that doesn't reflect the priorities of the American people? You can take your foot out of your mouth now, Congresswoman Schakowsky-you just did a number on the Democrat candidate for the presidency in 2012. I guess the Congresswoman thought we were too dumb to figure it out-it's President Obama that is making proposals that don't reflect the priorities of the American people. Not even the Congresswoman could cast a vote to support President Obama's budget proposal. How do you spell "hypocrite"? S-c-h-a-k-o-w-s-k-y.
Richard Schulte April 01, 2012 at 12:16 PM
Tax the "rich"? That's not the solution to this problem: "The $17 trillion in extra promises was revealed by an analysis of the law's long-term requirements. The additional obligations, when combined with existing Medicare and Medicaid funding shortfalls, leave taxpayers on the hook for an extra $82 trillion in health care obligations over the next 75 years. The federal government has an additional $17 trillion unfunded gap in other obligations, including Social Security, bringing the total shortfall to $99 trillion. That shortfall is different from existing debt. The federal government already owes $15 trillion in debt, including $5 trillion in funds borrowed during Obama's term in office." Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/04/more_surprises_found_in_obamacare_bill.html#ixzz1qn3B5DDQ The "rich" don't have enough money to cover this kind of wreckless spending.
Richard Schulte April 01, 2012 at 09:53 PM
Schakowsky: "Americans want leadership from their government that would rebuild the middle class and put our economy on a strong footing for the future." I agree with Congresswoman Schakowsky that we need leadership in America. An example of the kind of leader we need is Governor Scott Walker of Wisconsin. Congresswoman Schakowsky got free political coverage in the Patch article above, so here's a little equal time for the opposition: scottwalker.org I stand with Scott Walker. Get a yard sign to put up in your front yard in Crook County or get an "I stand with Scott Walker" tee-shirt. Governor Walker is also accepting donations to help in his recall election. A victory for Governor Walker in the recall election is a victory in the battle for the heart and soul of America. It's time for patriotic Americans to take a stand against what's been going on in America since November 2008. "Give me liberty of give me death." Patrick Henry

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something