.

Golf D-67 Explains Referendum at Open House

District 67 made cuts after March referendum failed; the Niles- Morton Grove district is asking for less money now. Voters must decide if they want to pay more in property taxes to improve programs and the buildings in the district.

 

Voters who live in Golf Elementary School District 67 will be asked to vote on a referendum on their Nov. 6 election ballots (or earlier if they participate in Early Voting).

Recently, parent volunteers, administrators and consultants sat in the library at Golf Middle School Open House to explain why they are asking citizens to vote yes. They also explained how much they have cut from the budget, and how much the referendum would cost voters in property taxes, if it gets passed. 

The district has 550 students, who live in Morton Grove and Niles, at two schools: Hynes Elementary and Golf Middle School. 

Tom Sikoral, a parent who has three children in the district, was manning a slide presentation that showed how much money the district had cut from its budget since the previous referendum questions failed in the election in March.

The total savings, after all the cuts, is $722,684.

District cut programs, staff

Cuts included salary negotiations with the teachers union, refinancing to get a lower interest rate, eliminating teachers, staff and programs, requiring a fee for students to participate in athletics and reducing early and late bus routes, the library/media center and the full-day kindergarten program.

The district has also reduced the amount of money it is asking for since the March request. The new plan calls less work to be done--Sikoral explained the district cut out certain items on its wish list, such as reconfiguring the front of the schools, redoing the parking lots and a diesel generator--for a facilities ask of $7.9 million. (That's down from the $9.7 million request in last spring's election.) The other referendum question, for operating expenses, is for $1.14 million.

Building repairs, improvements would be made

Architect Leanne Meyer-Smith of Wight & Co. gave an overview of the building repairs and improvements that will be made if the referendum passes. Photos of the aged boiler, masonry cracks, unsecure doors and gymnasium that doubles as a lunchroom can be seen here

"We did a facilities assessment and looked at both schools top to bottom," she said. 

The district asked people who visited previous open houses to choose the repairs and improvements most important to them, and put those on its "to be done" list if the referendum passes. 

"Both schools would get new HVAC systems. They're both really worn down," Meyer-Smith said. 

Of the repairs to be done, $2 million would be at Hynes Elementary and $1.5 million at Golf Middle School.

No room for kids to take Physical Education

The next biggest expense at Hynes is the new gym. Meyer-Smith explained that the cafeteria at Hynes is in use for so many hours that there are not enough hours in the day left to offer physical education classes (in the same room). Illinois requires students to take physical education; but District 67 has gotten a waiver from the state. It expires in 2016, however, she said.

Plumbing at both school buildings is original, and is corroded and needs to be replaced, according to Meyer-Smith. Some masonry and doors also need to be fixed, and while the ceilings are down, the district would install fire safety sprinklers.

What it would cost

The facilities question, if passed, would cost Morton Grove residents $27 per every $1,000 they pay in property taxes, and Niles residents $30 for every $1,000 they pay in property taxes

The operating funds question, if passed, would cost Morton Grove residents $45 per every $1,000 of property taxes paid, and Niles residents $49 for every $1,000 of property taxes paid.

If both referendums pass, then the owner of a Morton Grove home who pays $5,000 in property taxes would  pay an additional $360 annually. The owner of a Niles home would pay an additional $395. For a home with a $10,000 property tax bill, double those amounts.

Elizabeth Hennessy, a financial consultant with William Blair, provided moredetailed information about what the referendums would cost residents in property taxes, which can be seen here.

After Election Day

If the referendums pass, the district would restore programs and staff it cut, Sikoral said. If it fails, more staff and program cuts will be made, including increasing class size by forming multi-age classrooms.

Sikoral said he got involved because he has observed that schools today require technology, which makes it more expensive to operate them.

"Being a parent, I want my kids to get the best education that's out there," he said. "When they go to high school, these kids get an amazing amount of awards. The base education here is excellent. That's one of the reasons I moved to this school district. I like the smaller school district and lower teacher-student ratio."

 

Z October 30, 2012 at 01:06 PM
Have there been efforts at raising money as has been done over the past few decades for these schools? Donations? Fund drives? Just curious. Im new in the district since February and I'm voting yes.
grandpa October 30, 2012 at 07:20 PM
$7,900,000 divided by 550 students is $14,363.64 per student, (a little more than half what I have as in income over a years' time). The story mentions salary negotiations with the teachers' union. A reduced amount of a pay increase is not a pay cut. Many folks haven't had a raise in 4 or more years. Seniors COLA on their Social Security has been under $30 per month. They have learned to live within their means. The biggest expense according to the story is a new gym. Couldn't something be worked out with the M.G. Park District? I pay just under $8,000 per year in taxes. Multiplying the two figures given in the story by 8 I come up with an additional $508.00 per year in tax. Perhaps it would make sense to consolidate rather than maintain two apparently run down facilities. I just can't afford any more taxes and I am voting NO!
Concerned November 01, 2012 at 07:32 PM
We're voting NO also along with many of my neighbors. No additional funds until after union negotiations!
GOB November 02, 2012 at 12:50 AM
"Concerned", what may I ask are you hoping to come of the union negotiations? Even if the board comes out on top, the district is still going to be in dire need of the money. If it is a tax issue, then that is another thing, but I am just curious what the negotiations have to do with your stance in this situation. Grandpa, I agree that consolidation would make a great deal of sense. But it was just a few years ago that a consolidation plan was proposed at very little cost to the district. It would have meant adding on to one of the schools and selling off the other one. For the most part this plan was met with resistance, so it was scrapped. Now the referendum is apparently the only option left.
Chuck Falzone November 03, 2012 at 01:31 AM
I am voting Yes. When my wife and I moved to MG recently, it was in part because of good schools. Now, with my daughter a few years from starting school, we're faced with the possibility that she'll only be offered half-day kindergarten in dilapidated schools with no sprinkler systems. And larger class sizes. Had we known this when we were shopping for a house, it'd have been a big strike against moving to the district. If families choose to move elsewhere because our schools are declining in comparison to others in the area, we'll end up paying higher property taxes anyway, and not just for the schools. I urge everyone to do the right thing and vote yes on these referenda.
Concerned November 05, 2012 at 09:36 PM
What It boils down to is property taxes! Some residence (some with children in SD 67) are holding on to their houses by their fingernails and further tax increases may force some of them to move. I know many of them will vote NO based on conversations I have had. Some of the older residents in the area (I am one of them) would like to retire in their homes. At the current property tax rate increases, that will not be possible for many. My taxes have increased some 400% since 1988 when I moved in. Also, lets be truthful here, SD 67 plans to come back again in 2 years with another referendum even if this one passes. Plus, the state looks to off-load the pension liability back to the local school districts (and I don't blame them) causing more potential tax increases. What are we to do? Stop throwing money at something that is unsustainable. We can't have 140K librarians (retired)! We can have administrators being paid 300K plus (retired). And don't give me the BS about good schools help to maintain property values - In this market it does not matter! Also, high taxes does more to impair home values. You really want to see the financial reality of the area - Go look at WWW.ILFLS.COM and checkout the foreclosure data for Morton Grove. Stop the madness!
Christine November 06, 2012 at 02:42 AM
Dear Mr. Falzone, Voting yes is not "doing the right thing." Setting a budget, being fiscally responsible and using the money entrusted to you wisely is. There are other options for full-day kindergarten. They may not be free, but they are still good options in a safe environment with a low student-teacher ratio. St. John Brebeuf School in Niles, for example, could offer your daughter an excellent full day pre-school and kindergarten education. Its not free, but its affordable and worth every penny. With or without this referendum, we will still be in a very good school district. Its all relative. When you compare our Dist. 67 to other districts, we're still pretty darn good and have so much to offer. I don't believe anyone is debating the need for building repairs; I believe at the heart of the debate among those of us who are voting no is the huge waste of money that has plagued this district for many, many years and the lack of a plan for turning things around and spending our tax dollars wisely. Until that can be guaranteed, I will vote no.
Chuck Falzone November 06, 2012 at 03:32 AM
Ms. Aragon, As far as I can tell, there is no "huge waste of money that has plagued this district for many, many years." I heard similar claims when these referenda were on the ballot this spring, and despite my best efforts, I was completely unable to find specific information about it online. What I did find, in an article in the Champion, is that the district had not asked for an increase in its tax rate *since 1969.* I understand that property tax hikes are painful; at the same time, asking for one every fifty or so years is more than reasonable. It's also evidence, in itself, that the district has been fiscally responsible. Voting yes on these referenda is absolutely the right thing to do.
Z November 07, 2012 at 01:41 AM
Why does everyone appear to think that referendum is the only means to raise money? How do you think it was done during the decades that SD 67 did not pass referendum? I'd rather provide a $1000.00 donation than see $1k more in property taxes per year. Raise money, be accountable, stop giving ridiculous pensions to the staff and administration.
o November 07, 2012 at 05:20 AM
I agree that teachers in golf 67 are highly paid, even compared with East Main 63, but also Illnois does not fund schools well through State aid. They rely on property taxes. Why you may be willing to give a donation, I shouldn't have to sell brownies for my child to have gym class (a state mandated requirement). There are too many old people here who don't even pay the high property tax. Also many parents may not be able to vote because they are all foriegners. We need to reneogogiate the salaries of teachers or merge school districts ( I wish). But the building is horrible it looks like it belongs in the ghetto. Also all you old people your property values will go down even more. So when you move to Florida or youe children selll you stuff in an estate sale you won't be leaving them much. Stop taking the niles free bus I pay for....
o November 07, 2012 at 05:32 AM
Also all you families who send your kids to SJB, I think you have a right to send your kids to your religion's school but please we are not all Catholic in this area. SJB average class size is 30 students (in a private school). They don't even have a playground?? For the old folks (yeah is sucks your property tax increaases) but my social security tax goes uo each year too. But I can't vote you out of existence, maybe move to another area outside of here. But I agree the teachers are ridiculously paid high. Some college profs don't make that much....$86K. In my home state they make do with less (outside of IL).

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »